While it’s been fun arguing over consoles that have been obsolete for like ten years now (maybe next time we’ll go over which version of the Atari was the best), everything’s gotta come to a close eventually. Of course, like 97% of arguments, it was completely irrelevant because every point hinged entirely on opinion, and for the sake of this particular disagreement, opinions cannot be wrong, they can only conflict.
One little note before I go though, is something that always gets on my nerves. Just because a game has an E rating and blood isn’t a consequence of every possible action, doesn’t mean it’s for children. If it’s got Teletubbies on the cover, yeah, maybe it is, but for the most part, that E is an accurate representation that everyone should be able to enjoy the game. If you think you can’t enjoy a game because it’s colourful and not overly violent, then you have some growing up to do. Taking a perfectly random example, Kingdom Hearts was not only rated E and stuffed with cute and colourful characters, but it also carried nearly every Disney licence seen in the past 70-odd years. Yet if you actually play the game rather than blowing it off at the sight of Mickey Mouse, you’ll see that it would take someone who’s at the very least around fifteen years old to truly appreciate the game. Its sequel was even deeper, and most of the things that make it a truly fantastic game would be completely lost on children.
I don’t like to get riled up about silly things, but when people will deny the worth of something because it doesn’t feature anything that might spark some kind of controversy, it drives me bananas. In that way, I envy non-Americanized culture because they can appreciate things that aren’t drenched in violence. Don’t get me wrong, though. I loves me some violence (especially when zombies are involved), I just don’t believe it’s a requisite for quality.