{"id":5264,"date":"2015-06-26T14:39:40","date_gmt":"2015-06-26T19:39:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/?p=5264"},"modified":"2015-06-26T14:41:40","modified_gmt":"2015-06-26T19:41:40","slug":"ryans-spelling-tips-for-the-internet-wouldve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/?p=5264","title":{"rendered":"Ryan\u2019s Spelling Tips For The Internet: Would&#8217;ve"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve been seeing this one <em>a lot<\/em> lately, and it&#8217;s really starting to get to me.<\/p>\n<p>People: <strong>&#8220;Would of&#8221; is not a thing. Don&#8217;t type that.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The correct phrasing is &#8220;would have.&#8221; The contraction is &#8220;would&#8217;ve&#8221; and when you say it out lot, it does sound a little like &#8220;would of,&#8221; but that&#8217;s <em>so, so wrong<\/em>. And it makes me think that you are incredibly stupid because when you type &#8220;would of&#8221; instead of one of the proper forms, technically,\u00a0your sentence no longer means anything. Or, it means something that doesn&#8217;t make any sense.<\/p>\n<p>See, &#8220;have&#8221; and &#8220;of&#8221; have very different meanings. &#8220;Have&#8221; is possessive in favour of the subject, most often\u00a0describing a missed opportunity of some description.\u00a0&#8220;Of&#8221; in this case, would make it to mean that the &#8220;would&#8221; belongs to the object. See the following improper sentence:<\/p>\n<p><em>Paul would of eaten the cake.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>You can sort of make this sentence meaningful by adding a comma, turning &#8220;would&#8221; into a title, and making &#8220;eaten the cake&#8221; the name of a place.<\/p>\n<p><em>Paul, Would of Eatenthecake.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And now it&#8217;s stupid. See what you did? Stop being stupid! Write it this way:<\/p>\n<p><em>Paul would have eaten the cake.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Or this way:<\/p>\n<p><em>Paul would&#8217;ve eaten the cake.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And it will be correct. And you will no longer be stupid. I feel like I shouldn&#8217;t have to add this, but the same rule goes for &#8220;should have&#8221; and &#8220;could have.&#8221; Stop putting &#8220;of&#8221; where it doesn&#8217;t belong! ARGH!<\/p>\n<p>Fun fact: The &#8220;would have [verb]&#8221; construction is, in the English language, known as the <em>Conditional Perfect<\/em>. This is mostly irrelevant to everything.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve been seeing this one a lot lately, and it&#8217;s really starting to get to me. People: &#8220;Would of&#8221; is not a thing. Don&#8217;t type that. The correct phrasing is &#8220;would have.&#8221; The contraction is &#8220;would&#8217;ve&#8221; and when you say it out lot, it does sound a little like &#8220;would of,&#8221; but that&#8217;s so, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/?p=5264\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Ryan\u2019s Spelling Tips For The Internet: Would&#8217;ve<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-spelling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5264"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5267,"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5264\/revisions\/5267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrentialequilibrium.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}